Well, the book A Repair Kit for Grading: 15 Fixes for Broken Grades is a lot more "controversial" than the last two books we read. I feel like I am a pretty progressive teacher, but some of the ideas in this book were very hard for me to swallow. I'm just going to go through each fix.
Fix #1 - Don't include student behaviors (effort, participation, adherence to class rules, etc.) in grades; include only achievement.
I just about fell off my chair when I read that! How, as an art teacher, in a performance based class can I NOT include effort and participation?!? I was very resistant to this at first. I understand what the author is saying about grades only measuring achievement, but part of their achieving the task IS effort. I was very concerned about this.
I took a look at my rubrics. Each one includes a section on effort. After some reflection, I am considering not grading that portion, but still including that feedback. Some effort is considered in the craftsmanship section, but I don't think I want to change that at this point.
Fix #2 - Don't reduce marks on work submitted late; provide support for the learner.
This is already a policy in my classroom. I still set due dates and collect the work. I tell the students that if it is incomplete or they just want to improve their grade, they can resubmit it at anytime and I will regrade it with no penalty. I have found this to be successful in my classroom. Most students who are not done with a project complete it within a week of the due date. I was worried about the end of the quarter, getting an influx of projects and papers to grade, but that really didn't happen. I think the students deserve credit for the work they have done, so I won't penalize for lateness. I hear others say that "in the real world there are deadlines." Yeah, I know, but sometimes you can't meet those deadlines. My first quarter at RHS I didn't get my report cards in on time. I was a new teacher, projects were stacked to the ceiling, and I was still learning how to use the gradebook. Did I get fired? No. I called my principal, told him the situation, and we came up with a solution. Most deadlines are flexible (to an extent) even in the real world.
Fix #3 - Don't give points for extra credit or use bonus points; seek only evidence that more work has resulted in a higher level of achievement.
I do not offer bonus points in my class. This is mainly because I don't see the point. If it is an important question, it should be on the test. If isn't relevant (ie. what's my first name) it shouldn't be on the test.
Fix #4 - Don't punish academic dihonesty with reduced grades; apply other consequesnces and reassess to determine actual level of achievement.
As long as there is some other sort of consequence I'm fine with this. It will require me to change my classroom policy. Right now, at the beginning of the year, I have my students sign an academic integrity contract. We go over it thoroughly in class. They know exactly what I mean by plagiarism, cheating, and lying, and how they apply to my class. We go over the consequences for each one. I tell them that if they choose to break this rule, they choose to deal with the consequence. The reason I started this is because I had issues with plagiarism my first year. There was no policy for the school. So, when I reported it to the office, they told me to take care of it. I think there needs to be a school-wide policy on this.
Fix #5 - Don't consider attendance in grade determination; report absences separately.
Do people do this? I have never ancountered a teacher or school that graded on attendance. Hmm.
Fix #6 - Don't include group scores in grades; use only individual achievement evidence.
I have always given individual scores, even for group work. You should only be evaluated on YOUR work, not the work of others. You only have control over yourself.
Friday, November 8, 2013
Monday, January 28, 2013
Rubrics and Feedback
It has taken me a long time to figure out how I want to assess and grade my students. I had to evaluate what I thought was most important. I started out with rubrics based on the ones given to me when I was student teaching.
They looked like this:
What's wrong with this you ask? It provides no reason why I am rating them the way I am. It doesn't tell them what was expected. What is "excellent" vs. "good"? (Plus, someone who is rated "excellent" could still end up with an 80%. Would you give "excellent" work a C? (I don't realize that until later.)
So I switch to this style:
I liked this one. I rated them, it basically tells them why. The problem was I felt like I was punishing them for being a "novice". You fail just because you are learning the skill still? Isn't "novice" where most of my beginning students would be? I figure, the first column should get an "A", the second a "B", and so on.
Onto the next version:
But how do I figure out what percentage to put in the grade book? I created this chart to help me:
The new rubric and grading scale have served me well for the past year. I did tweak the rubric one more time for this semester. I included a back for student response. Why? I want to know more about what they thought of the process. Why they chose to do their project the way they did. I also want to know how they thought they did. It's good for them to think about these aspects of their art. I also make sure to hand out the rubric at the beginning of the project so they know what I expect from them.
On the back they must answer questions about the project.
I have also decided to keep their rubrics and photos of their projects in a file for them. Since we began looking at our standards and how we assess them, I thought it would be important to keep track of their progress. I also want to see how they grow semester to semester and year to year. If we end up moving to standards-based grading, I'll pretty much be good to go!
Is this the final product? No. I still feel like I need to be more specific about why they got the ranking that they did. I am in the process of creating a conference document to include in their folder. Will we formally conference about every project, not likely. But, it's a process after all.
They looked like this:
Assessment
Rubric
|
|||||||
Name:
|
Period:
|
||||||
Assignment:
Collage in the Style of Keith Grace
|
Date:
|
||||||
Circle
the number in pencil that best
shows how well you feel that you completed that criterion for the assignment.
|
Excellent
|
Good
|
Average
|
Needs
Improvement
|
Rate Yourself
|
Teacher Rating
|
|
Criteria 1- Preparation:
· Completed at
least five preliminary drawings in sketchbook.
· Participated
in class discussions.
|
10-8
|
7-5
|
4-3
|
2-1
|
|||
Criteria 2- Effort:
· Took time to
develop idea and project (didn’t rush)
· Was willingness
to work through difficult areas
· Properly cleaned-up/stored
materials
· Energy and
focus went toward your project
|
10-8
|
7-5
|
4-3
|
2-1
|
|||
Criteria 3- Craftsmanship:
· Neat, clean,
and complete
· Skillfully
used art tools and media
· Effectively
used of space
· Produced a
work of art in the style of Keith Grace
|
10-8
|
7-5
|
4-3
|
2-1
|
|||
Criteria 4- Assessment:
· Incorporated at
least five different media into your piece
· Actively
participated in critique
· Completed the
self-evaluation and response thoughtfully and honestly
|
10-8
|
7-5
|
4-3
|
2-1
|
|||
Total:
|
What's wrong with this you ask? It provides no reason why I am rating them the way I am. It doesn't tell them what was expected. What is "excellent" vs. "good"? (Plus, someone who is rated "excellent" could still end up with an 80%. Would you give "excellent" work a C? (I don't realize that until later.)
So I switch to this style:
Pun and Ink Rubric
|
||||||
Advanced 9-10
|
Proficient 7-8
|
Novice 4-6
|
Needs Improvement 1-3
|
|||
Composition
|
Arrangement of objects makes excellent use of the space. Whole
drawing moves the eye from one object to another.
|
Arrangement of objects makes good use of space. Some movement
from object to object, but could have been further developed.
|
Need more attention to composition, arrangement does not easily
lead eye from object to object.
|
Arrangement is uninteresting. The eye does not flow to any other
parts of the drawing, jumps or parts are distracting.
|
||
Theme
|
The theme of the student’s pun is
clear, well-illustrated and original.
|
The theme of the student’s pun is
illustrated and mostly original.
|
The theme of the student’s pun is
somewhat illustrated and/or not very original.
|
The theme of the student’s pun is not
illustrated. The drawing does not
relate to the pun.
|
||
Value and Texture
|
Student chose a light source and effectively showed it. Work displays many methods for
showing texture/ value (hatching, cross hatching, stippling)
|
Student chose a light source and somewhat effectively showed a
variety of values. Work displays some methods for showing texture/ value.
|
Student's choice of light source was not clear. Shows little change in texture or
value.
|
Student's choice of light source was not found. Shows no change in texture or value.
|
||
Technique
|
Materials were used properly and neatly. No stray marks or
smudges are evident.
|
Materials were almost always used properly and neatly. Few stray
marks or smudges are evident.
|
Materials were often used inappropriately. Many stray marks or
smudges are evident.
|
Materials were not used properly or neatly. Many stray marks or
smudges are evident.
|
||
Craftsmanship
|
The artwork was patiently done with time spent on details. It
was done neatly and well planned out.
|
The artwork was done well, but lacked the finishing touches.
Almost all of the project was put together neatly.
|
The student showed average craftsmanship. More attention should
have been paid to details, neatness and planning.
|
The student showed below average craftsmanship, lack of pride in
finished work.
|
||
Effort and Clean Up
|
Used ALL time wisely, had a good attitude the entire time, tried
as hard as they could. Student cleaned up all supplies appropriately and on time each
period.
|
Used MOST time wisely, had a good attitude most of the time,
stayed on task. Student cleaned up most of the supplies appropriately and
usually right away each period.
|
Was reminded often to stay on task and put forth little effort.
Did not put the time and effort into the project that was needed.
Student did not often clean up supplies appropriately and/or on time each
period.
|
Attitude and effort needs improvement. Put little effort into
the assignment. Student did not clean up supplies appropriately and/or on time
each period.
|
||
Total:
|
I liked this one. I rated them, it basically tells them why. The problem was I felt like I was punishing them for being a "novice". You fail just because you are learning the skill still? Isn't "novice" where most of my beginning students would be? I figure, the first column should get an "A", the second a "B", and so on.
Onto the next version:
Coil Pot Rubric
|
|||||
Advanced 9-10 A
|
Proficient 7-8 B
|
Novice 5-6 C
|
Needs Improvement 1-4 D/F
|
||
Composition
|
Pot
is interesting from all angles, great use of line and space, effective 3-D
design. Interesting and dynamic shape.
|
Satisfying
use of line and space, could develop more intrigue with better 3-D design.
|
More
development with line and space, needs more coiling practice. Shape is too
simple, lacks complexity.
|
Line
and space unrelated to pot construction and design, unbalanced, unresolved,
or incomplete design.
|
|
Design Choice
|
Vessel
is 8 inches tall and successfully incorporates 3 different types of coiling
techniques.
|
Vessel
is 8 inches tall and incorporates 3 different types of coiling techniques but
vessel in slightly awkward where coils transition.
|
Vessel
is not 8 inches tall or does not incorporate 3 different coiling
techniques. Transition areas are
awkward and don’t fit together.
|
Vessel
is not 8 inches tall and there are not 3 different coiling techniques used.
|
|
Creativity
|
Pot
is intriguing and unique. Design is
well planned and crafted.
|
Fairly
original design, interesting layout and manipulation of the clay.
|
Design
shows understanding of coil pot construction.
Not much originality.
|
Obvious
construction issues, lacking detail, unoriginal, incomplete design.
|
|
Glaze Use
|
Used
3 flowing coats, no missed or thin areas, applied glaze carefully to avoid
unwanted bleeding.
|
Used
3 coats, but may have been sloppy with application. Some missed areas or thin areas. Some bleeding of colors.
|
Slow
down and apply glaze with care and patience.
Sloppy application led to missed areas.
|
Inconsistent
application of glaze. Very rushed,
lots of missed, thin areas. Glaze
bleeds into other areas.
|
|
Work Process
|
Pot
completed on time, strong personal interest and independent drive, went above
expectations.
|
Pot
completed on time, met expectations, some independence and drive exhibited.
|
Pot
completed on time, could have used time in class more wisely or spent some
time outside of class, meets most expectations.
|
Pot
turned in late or missed a firing. Inconsistent effort, needs constant
prompting and motivation. Pot did not meet size requirement.
|
|
Craftsmanship
|
Pot
is well constructed, sturdy, no loose clay or cracked coils. Pot is level and symmetrical.
|
Pot
is adequately constructed, coils are neatly stacked, minimal cracking. Some issues with symmetry or pot is leaning
slightly.
|
Satisfying
construction, could have taken more time on neatness, some cracking or
joining issues. Lacks symmetry.
|
Sloppy
construction, coils not attached well, lots of cracking, pot is not sturdy.
|
|
Effort and Clean Up
|
Went
above expectations, stayed on task and worked independently.
|
Met
expectations, stayed on task and worked fairly independently.
|
Needs
prompting to stay on task, works some-what independently.
|
Off
task most of the time, constant prompting, work below expectations.
|
|
Total:
|
But how do I figure out what percentage to put in the grade book? I created this chart to help me:
The new rubric and grading scale have served me well for the past year. I did tweak the rubric one more time for this semester. I included a back for student response. Why? I want to know more about what they thought of the process. Why they chose to do their project the way they did. I also want to know how they thought they did. It's good for them to think about these aspects of their art. I also make sure to hand out the rubric at the beginning of the project so they know what I expect from them.
Mixed Media Painting Rubric
|
||||||
Advanced 9-10 A
|
Proficient 7-8 B
|
Novice 5-6 C
|
Needs Improvement 1-4 D/F
|
You
|
Skeen
|
|
Composition
|
The composition includes all three parts. Colors
work well together. Texture/ line quality/ images contribute to the unity of
the project.
|
The composition does not include all three parts. The student used some colors that worked
well together, and they worked hard to use texture to help them express their
ideas, but there are gaps in the work that keep the viewer’s eye stuck in one
spot. More media was needed.
|
The composition does not include all three parts.
Colors did not suite composition as well as they should of. No texture was
created, or line quality was considered. Media choices did not help the
overall project.
|
Colors did not suite composition. Student did not
give time and effort to create texture. Composition had no planning at all.
Composition had no consideration to overall piece.
|
||
Message
|
Student’s message was clear and well thought
out. The quote pops out from the page.
|
The student’s message was fairly clear and thought
out. The quote was clearly stated on
the page.
|
The student wrote their message but the quote is
somewhat lost on the page.
|
The quote blends into the background or the words
are placed to where the message is lost or hard to read.
|
||
Creativity
|
The artwork demonstrates original personal
expression and outstanding problem solving skills.
Artwork includes many different media. |
The artwork demonstrates some personal expression
and logical problem solving skills. Artwork includes some different media.
|
The artwork demonstrates an average amount of
personal expression.
Artwork includes some media but needs more variation for it to truly be a mixed media work. |
The artwork demonstrates little personal
expression and problem solving skills. More media is needed.
|
||
Unity
|
Artwork all comes together in harmony. Colors,
textures, line, all work together.
Composition has asymmetry, diagonal, and thirds that properly work on page. |
Artwork does have very strong areas that stand out
in their excellence.
However, there are other areas that do not work in the art. Instead they are a distraction to the overall piece. These areas were talked about in critique. |
The work has random areas that do not connect to
the rest of the painting.
Student has areas that need more attention and detail in order to contribute to the overall unity of the piece. |
Students work has no direction. It is sloppily
created with little consideration to composition.
There is no theme, idea, or anything of substance present in student's work. |
||
Craftsmanship
|
The artwork shows outstanding craftsmanship, with
clear attention to detail.
|
The artwork shows good craftsmanship, with some
attention to detail.
|
The artwork shows average craftsmanship and
attention to detail.
|
The artwork shows below average to poor
craftsmanship and little attention to detail.
|
||
Effort and Clean Up
|
The student put forth extraordinary effort to
complete the project well as possible; used class time extremely well.
|
The student put forth the effort required to
complete the project well; used class time well.
|
The student put forth the effort required to
finish the project; used class time adequately.
|
The student put forth no effort or the project was
not completed; class time was not used well.
|
||
Total:
|
On the back they must answer questions about the project.
1. What
were the best and most difficult aspects of this project? Explain in DETAIL!
2. Why did you choose the quote you did? Explain in DETAIL. How does it relate to you?
3. According to the rubric on the back of this sheet, what grade do you deserve? Why do you deserve this grade?
2. Why did you choose the quote you did? Explain in DETAIL. How does it relate to you?
3. According to the rubric on the back of this sheet, what grade do you deserve? Why do you deserve this grade?
I deserve _________ out of 60
points. Here’s why:
I have also decided to keep their rubrics and photos of their projects in a file for them. Since we began looking at our standards and how we assess them, I thought it would be important to keep track of their progress. I also want to see how they grow semester to semester and year to year. If we end up moving to standards-based grading, I'll pretty much be good to go!
Is this the final product? No. I still feel like I need to be more specific about why they got the ranking that they did. I am in the process of creating a conference document to include in their folder. Will we formally conference about every project, not likely. But, it's a process after all.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)